This report documents how the USPTO is breaching its legal obligations under the AIA by refusing to correct its own patent examination errors, despite a statutory obligation to make such corrections if USPTO finds a “reasonable likelihood” that an issued patent claim is invalid in conjunction with an IPR petition.

BSA supports the development and deployment of reliable content authentication and provenance mechanisms that can help users identify the history and origin of AI-generated content.

BSA’s comments on the first draft of the EU Code of Practice on transparency requirements under Article 50 of the AI Act caution that the proposal risks exceeding the Act’s scope and creating disproportionate technical and operational burdens.