Loading...
Skip to main content

Like many websites, BSA’s websites use cookies to ensure the efficient functioning of those websites and give our users the best possible experience. You can learn more about how we use cookies, and how you can change your browser's cookie settings, in our cookies statement. By continuing to use this site without changing your cookie settings, you consent to our use of cookies.

X

JUN 12, 2026 | ASIA PACIFIC | AUSTRALIA | GOVERNMENT SUBMISSION

Australia: BSA Comments on Guidance for Transparency in Automated Decision-Making

BSA filed comments to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner’s (OAIC) on the OAIC’s proposed Guidance for Transparency in Automated Decision-Making (ADM). BSA encouraged the OAIC to adopt clearer and tailored interpretations of key concepts underpinning the new ADM transparency obligation, including when a system is “substantially and directly related” to making a decision, and what decisions “significantly affect” an individual’s rights or interests. BSA also recommended that the Guidance distinguish between controllers and processors when interpreting who has “arranged for” the use of ADM.

Download PDF